Estate Matters: The Fine Line Between Friendship and Patient Coercion

Disclaimer:  While every attempt is made to ensure that drug dosages provided within the text of this journal and the website are accurate, readers are urged to check drug package inserts before prescribing. Views and opinions in this publication and the website are not necessarily endorsed by or reflective of those of the publisher.

Estate Matters: The Fine Line Between Friendship and Patient Coercion

 

Tracey Tremayne-Lloyd
and Lonny J. Rosen

Tremayne-Lloyd Partners
Toronto, Ontario

Introduction
Genuine and personal care, trust and friendship often characterize the relationship between a physician and his or her geriatric patient. In fact, your patient's regard for you may become so strong that a situation arises where you, as an attending physician, may be named as a beneficiary of his or her Will. This may place you in an awkward position, and indeed, if the patient's family complains, may attract College scrutiny. It is not unknown for a family to contest such a bequest on the grounds that the physician exercised undue influence, that the testator was incompetent, or both. The fact that a bequest is challenged, however, does not mean that the gift will be declared invalid.

 

Undue influence is more than persuasion; it is tantamount to coercion to the extent that another person overbore the volition of the person making the gift.

Undue Influence


Undue influence is more than persuasion; it is tantamount to coercion to the extent that another person overbore the volition of the person making the gift.